Meeting Agenda:
Planning and Transport
| Meeting Date: | Monday 24 Apr 2023 |
|---|---|
| Time: | 19:30 |
| Councillors | Jon Aldridge Vice-Chairman, Angela Baker, Sarah Compton, Michael Gemmell Smith, Vic Jennings, Alan Layland Chairman, Nick Lloyd, Margot McArthur, Stuart McGregor, Angela Read, Stephen Sumner, Bob Todd. |
| Committee: | Planning and Transport |
| Venue: | Rickards Hall. 72a High Street Edenbridge, TN8 5AR Kent |
| Notes: | |
| Summary: |
Agenda
Minutes
Members of the District Council wish to state that although they will be considering planning applications at this meeting they would be reconsidering them at the district level, taking into account all relevant evidence and representations there.
Members of the District Council wish to state that although they will be considering planning applications at this meeting they would be reconsidering them at the district level, taking into account all relevant evidence and representations there.
Members of the public, and members with prejudicial interests on items on the Agenda, may make representations, answer, ask questions and give evidence at this meeting in respect of items on the Agenda. (This is the only opportunity for members of the public to make a contribution during the meeting.)
Both public and members are limited to three minutes per person to speak and the total time designated for public questions shall not exceed fifteen minutes unless directed by the Chairman of the meeting.
Upwards extension to provide 3no.residential flats. Roof alterations, associated works.
This application has now been amended, and a summary of the main changes are set out below.
Amended plans received to alter the design of the development following officer recommendations, and to provide further information to address comments from the Highways Authority and the Environmental Health Officer.
Any comments you made on the original application will be considered when the decision is made.
| 23/00386/FUL |
| 23/00899/HOUSE |
| 23/00936/WTPO |
| 23/00852/DETAIL |
| 23/00910/DETAIL |
| 23/00911/DETAIL |
| 23/00912/DETAIL |
| 23/01117/PAH |
Status: Granted
| 23/00142/HOUSE |
Status: Granted
| 23/00396/HOUSE |
Status: Granted
| 23/00059/FUL |
Status: Granted
| 23/00499/HOUSE |
Please see attached historic documents.
i) Do members agree for the footpath to be recorded as the path which has always been walked? (D-B on the map) – not A-B on the map, which has never been walked and has been incorrectly recorded on that alignment when the historical documentary evidence shows it should be recorded as between D-B?
ii) The section recorded B-C is also incorrectly recorded on the map – The purple line is recorded on the Definitive Map and the dashed line shows where the path should run according to historic documentary evidence and shows the proposed amendment to the alignment of footpath SR620. Do members support the amendment to align the footpath (SR620) as shown as a dashed line (route to be added) and as show on the on the historical research evidence?
| Kent Footpaths Letter |
| Footpath Map Extract TQ44NE |
| Claimed amendment to the alignment of public footpath SR620 (part) at Edenbridge |